
Former Census Director Prewitt
EDITOR’S CHOICE: A lot of commentators assumed that the Obama triumph would put on end to much of the debate on race. But the opposite has happened and the issue is more toxic than ever. The NAACP calls the entire country in general and the Tea Party in particular racist. The New Black Panthers say only whites can be racists and that if Blacks “kill white babies,” it is justified. A Boston cop has to undergo an “Obama teaching moment,” for simply doing his job which involved a black man. Now Obama calls Arizona racist for enforcing immigration policies already approved by the Feds, and is suing the entire state. Many Americans want to know why the census asks exhaustive questions on ethnicity in what is supposed to be a color-blind, melting-pot society. Many citizens refuse to reply at all and others can’t even figure the questions out – for example is my daughter who is half Irish-American and half Pakistani-American an “Asian or Pacific Islander?”
Kenneth Prewitt who ran the Census Bureau and the 2000 head count for Bill Clinton, explained July 14 in USA Today how the arcane process came about, and offers some new ideas on how to simplify the debate a bit. But as a good liberal Democrat, he admits that “Policy responses to disparities in employment, education, health and incarceration call for statistics on groups being left behind. Diversity goals in universities and businesses use Census categories.” So the census is now driven by the priority on “income redistribution” mantra this administration is trying to force down our throats. Among its first actions was to try to move the Census Bureau into the White House. That is after all, why the Tea Party exists in the first place – to argue for responsible spending and less, not more government, and not for a platform that bases everything on race, which this gang that can’t shoot straight is doing with reckless abandon in Arizona and across its agenda. Here is Prewitt’s census primer: